Lift. The only thing that matters in a hire.

I've spent thirty years with a marketing lens pressed against every kind of business problem. The one that keeps coming back โ€” the one that costs organisations the most โ€” isn't a marketing problem at all. It's this.

๐˜๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐›๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐ž๐š๐ซ ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฉ๐š๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ. ๐’๐จ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐›๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ž And yet, something's missing. You can't name it in a performance review. It doesn't show up in the KPIs. But you feel it every time you're in a room with them.

This is not a hiring problem. This is a measurement problem.

The word "competent" comes from the Latin ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ meaning to be suitable.

Suitable.

We spent fifty years engineering sophisticated frameworks around that word. Behavioural interviews. Competency matrices. Structured scoring rubrics. Increasingly elaborate systems... all measuring the same thing.

Adequacy. And calling it talent.

๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ง'๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐š๐ข๐ฅ. ๐ˆ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ฒ.

Consider three equally competent FDs sitting across from you.

One is technically sharp, loyal, steady. Executes brilliantly within defined lanes.

One is technically sharp, curious, restless. Finds problems before you know they exist.

One is technically sharp, resourceful. Believes in the mission like it's personal.

Three identical CVs. Three completely different outputs.

In marketing, we'd never brief a campaign on demographics alone. Same income bracket, same postcode, same age but completely different buying behaviour, different values, different triggers. We call this the psychographic. It's the layer beneath the data that actually explains the human.

HR has been ignoring it entirely.

And then there's passion.

Every talent conversation arrives here eventually. We need passionate people. It's in every job description. It comes up in every debrief.

But passion is a flicker. It performs brilliantly in interviews. Shows up in the first 90 days. Then the work gets hard, the politics get heavy, the vision gets blurry, and passion has already quietly moved on.

๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐Ÿ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ. ๐‚๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ. ๐†๐ซ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ.

The quiet ones still asking questions at 6pm on a Friday. That's what sustains. These are not soft qualities. They are your hardest competitive advantage. And no competency framework is designed to find them.

Because competency is a floor. We've been mistaking it for a ceiling.

The employment relationship, at its best, is a value exchange. The organisation gives direction, resource, and context. The talent gives capability, conviction, and momentum. Together they move toward something.

That's not a transaction. That's not a headcount decision.

๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ญ.

And the right person in the right seat - the one with the package beyond the paper - doesn't just perform.

They lift.

If you're building a team and something still feels missing โ€” that's usually where I come in.

Next
Next

Before you think about who, think about The Triangle.